Lecturer(s)
|
-
Kalenda Jan, doc. Mgr. Ph.D.
|
Course content
|
The student will present and evaluate the interpretation of research data and their relationship to (old or emergent) theory. The student will show how the data support the theory and how they relate to the overall composition and conception of the dissertation. Merits and drawbacks of the interpretation will be discussed.
|
Learning activities and teaching methods
|
Dialogic (Discussion, conversation, brainstorming), Teamwork, Text analysis, Self-reflection, Individual work of students, Dealing with situational issues - learning in situations
- Preparation for course credit
- 150 hours per semester
- Term paper
- 150 hours per semester
|
prerequisite |
---|
Knowledge |
---|
Úspěšné absolvování předmětu Doktorský seminář III. |
Úspěšné absolvování předmětu Doktorský seminář III. |
learning outcomes |
---|
lists the basic rules of public speaking and presenting the results of their creative research is familiar with literature focused on presenting the results of scientific work is able to describe appropriate methods for data presentation describes the process of evaluating the quality of scientific work is familiar with the principles of publication ethics |
lists the basic rules of public speaking and presenting the results of their creative research is familiar with literature focused on presenting the results of scientific work is able to describe appropriate methods for data presentation describes the process of evaluating the quality of scientific work is familiar with the principles of publication ethics |
Skills |
---|
publicly presents and shares the results of their creative research during the third year of their doctoral studies receives feedback on their scientific work results and reflects upon it actively engages in group discussions with other students in the doctoral study program and presents their opinions self-reflectively and objectively evaluates the applied methodology levels evaluates the weaknesses and strengths of their project |
publicly presents and shares the results of their creative research during the third year of their doctoral studies receives feedback on their scientific work results and reflects upon it actively engages in group discussions with other students in the doctoral study program and presents their opinions self-reflectively and objectively evaluates the applied methodology levels evaluates the weaknesses and strengths of their project |
teaching methods |
---|
Knowledge |
---|
Individual work of students |
Text analysis |
Text analysis |
Dialogic (Discussion, conversation, brainstorming) |
Dialogic (Discussion, conversation, brainstorming) |
Individual work of students |
Self-reflection |
Self-reflection |
Teamwork |
Teamwork |
Dealing with situational issues - learning in situations |
Dealing with situational issues - learning in situations |
assessment methods |
---|
Analysis of the student's performance |
Analysis of a presentation given by the student |
Analysis of a presentation given by the student |
Analysis of the student's performance |
Recommended literature
|
-
Disman, Miroslav. Jak se vyrábí sociologická znalost : příručka pro uživatele. 3. vyd. Praha : Karolinum, 2000. ISBN 8024601397.
-
GAVORA, P. Úvod do pedagogického výzkumu. Brno: Paido, 2000.
-
HENDL, J. Přehled statistických metod zpracovávání dat. Praha: Portál, 2006. ISBN 80-7367-123-9.
-
Hendl, Jan. Kvalitativní výzkum : základní teorie, metody a aplikace. 2., aktualiz. vyd. Praha : Portál, 2008. ISBN 978-80-7367-485-4.
-
CHRÁSKA, M. Hypotézy a jejich ověřování v klasických pedagogických výzkumech. Olomouc: Votobia, 2005.
-
CHRÁSKA, M. ml. Uplatnění vícerozměrných statistických metod v pedagogickém výzkumu. Olomouc: Votobia, 2005.
-
Chráska, M. Základy výzkumu v pedagogice. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého, 2004.
-
Miovský, M., Čermák, I., Řehan, V. (eds.). Kvalitativní přístup a metody ve vědách o člověku. III. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého, 2004.
-
ŠVAŘÍČEK, R., ŠEĎOVÁ, K. a kol. Kvalitativní výzkum v pedagogických vědách. .
|