|
Lecturer(s)
|
-
Stránský Michal, Mgr. PhD.
|
|
Course content
|
1. Introduction to Argumentation 2. Argumentation Analysis: Basics 3. Argument Evaluation 4. Fallacies and Manipulation 5. Pragma-dialectics 6. The Audience 7. Strategic Maneuvering 8. "Arguing with a Moron" 9. Critical Discussion 10. Visual Argumentation 11. Practical Examples of the Argumentation Analysis 12. Practical Examples of the Argumentation Analysis II. 13. Summary
|
|
Learning activities and teaching methods
|
|
Lecturing, Dialogic (Discussion, conversation, brainstorming)
|
| prerequisite |
|---|
| Knowledge |
|---|
| The knowledge of the English language. |
| The knowledge of the English language. |
| Skills |
|---|
| The knowledge of the English language. |
| The knowledge of the English language. |
| learning outcomes |
|---|
| Knowledge |
|---|
| to describe the argumentative structure. |
| to describe the argumentative structure. |
| to explain what pragma-dialectics is and what tools does it use. |
| to explain what pragma-dialectics is and what tools does it use. |
| to list the basics fallacies and manipulation techniques. |
| to list the basics fallacies and manipulation techniques. |
| to list and explain the dialectical objectives of pragma-dialectics. |
| to list and explain the dialectical objectives of pragma-dialectics. |
| to explain the basics of the visual argumentation. |
| to explain the basics of the visual argumentation. |
| Skills |
|---|
| to recognize argumentative statements in communication. |
| to recognize argumentative statements in communication. |
| to extract arguments from the text, express them clearly, reveal their structure and hidden assumptions. |
| to extract arguments from the text, express them clearly, reveal their structure and hidden assumptions. |
| to identify basic logical fallacies and manipulative practices used in everyday communication. |
| to identify basic logical fallacies and manipulative practices used in everyday communication. |
| to evaluate argumentation from the point of view of pragma-dialectical objectives and apply means of strategic maneuvering in relation to the opponent/audience. |
| to evaluate argumentation from the point of view of pragma-dialectical objectives and apply means of strategic maneuvering in relation to the opponent/audience. |
| to interpret visual argumentation. |
| to interpret visual argumentation. |
| teaching methods |
|---|
| Knowledge |
|---|
| Dialogic (Discussion, conversation, brainstorming) |
| Dialogic (Discussion, conversation, brainstorming) |
| Lecturing |
| Lecturing |
| Skills |
|---|
| Activating (Simulation, games, dramatization) |
| Activating (Simulation, games, dramatization) |
| Text analysis |
| Text analysis |
| Dialogic (Discussion, conversation, brainstorming) |
| Dialogic (Discussion, conversation, brainstorming) |
| Teamwork |
| Teamwork |
| assessment methods |
|---|
| Knowledge |
|---|
| Written examination |
| Written examination |
|
Recommended literature
|
-
Eemeren, F. H. Grootendorst, R. Henkemans, A. F. S. Argumentation. Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. London, 2002.
-
Eemeren, Frans, H. et al. Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrech: Springer, 2014. ISBN 978-90-481-9472-8.
-
EEMEREN, Frans. H., HENKEMANS, A. F. Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation.
-
Picha, Marek. Kritické myšlení a rekonstrukce argumentu. Brno. Masarykova univerzita, 2014.
-
Rottenberg, A., T. The Structure of Argument. St. Martin, 2006.
-
ROTTENBERG, Annette T. &Donna Haisty WINCHELL. The Structure of Argument. 2008. ISBN 978-0-312-48048-6.
-
Szymanek, K. Umění argumentace-Úlohy na zkoumání argumentů. Olomouc: UP, 2004. ISBN 80-244-0834-1.
-
Walton, Douglas. Infromal Logic. A Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge: UP, 2008.
-
Weston, Anthony. A Rulebook for Arguments, Fifth Edition. Indianapolis, 2018. ISBN 978-1624666544.
|