Course: Theory of Argumentation

» List of faculties » FMK » KUMK
Course title Theory of Argumentation
Course code KUMK/EARGU
Organizational form of instruction Lecture + Seminar
Level of course Master
Year of study not specified
Semester Winter
Number of ECTS credits 5
Language of instruction English, English, English
Status of course Compulsory
Form of instruction Face-to-face
Work placements This is not an internship
Recommended optional programme components None
Lecturer(s)
  • Stránský Michal, Mgr. PhD.
Course content
1. Introduction to Argumentation 2. Argumentation Analysis: Basics 3. Argument Evaluation 4. Fallacies and Manipulation 5. Pragma-dialectics 6. The Audience 7. Strategic Maneuvering 8. "Arguing with a Moron" 9. Critical Discussion 10. Visual Argumentation 11. Practical Examples of the Argumentation Analysis 12. Practical Examples of the Argumentation Analysis II. 13. Summary

Learning activities and teaching methods
Lecturing, Dialogic (Discussion, conversation, brainstorming)
  • Participation in classes - 10 hours per semester
  • Preparation for examination - 45 hours per semester
  • Home preparation for classes - 45 hours per semester
prerequisite
Knowledge
The knowledge of the English language.
The knowledge of the English language.
Skills
The knowledge of the English language.
The knowledge of the English language.
learning outcomes
Knowledge
to describe the argumentative structure.
to describe the argumentative structure.
to explain what pragma-dialectics is and what tools does it use.
to explain what pragma-dialectics is and what tools does it use.
to list the basics fallacies and manipulation techniques.
to list the basics fallacies and manipulation techniques.
to list and explain the dialectical objectives of pragma-dialectics.
to list and explain the dialectical objectives of pragma-dialectics.
to explain the basics of the visual argumentation.
to explain the basics of the visual argumentation.
Skills
to recognize argumentative statements in communication.
to recognize argumentative statements in communication.
to extract arguments from the text, express them clearly, reveal their structure and hidden assumptions.
to extract arguments from the text, express them clearly, reveal their structure and hidden assumptions.
to identify basic logical fallacies and manipulative practices used in everyday communication.
to identify basic logical fallacies and manipulative practices used in everyday communication.
to evaluate argumentation from the point of view of pragma-dialectical objectives and apply means of strategic maneuvering in relation to the opponent/audience.
to evaluate argumentation from the point of view of pragma-dialectical objectives and apply means of strategic maneuvering in relation to the opponent/audience.
to interpret visual argumentation.
to interpret visual argumentation.
teaching methods
Knowledge
Dialogic (Discussion, conversation, brainstorming)
Dialogic (Discussion, conversation, brainstorming)
Lecturing
Lecturing
Skills
Activating (Simulation, games, dramatization)
Activating (Simulation, games, dramatization)
Text analysis
Text analysis
Dialogic (Discussion, conversation, brainstorming)
Dialogic (Discussion, conversation, brainstorming)
Teamwork
Teamwork
assessment methods
Knowledge
Written examination
Written examination
Recommended literature
  • EEMEREN, F. H. van a SNOECK HENKEMANS, Arnolda Francisca. Argumentation: analysis and evaluation. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2017. ISBN 978-1-138-22507-7.
  • EEMEREN, Frans. H. et al. Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrech: Springer, 2014. ISBN 978-90-481-9472-8.
  • Heinrichs, Jay. Thank You for Arguing, Fourth Edition: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson Can Teach Us about the Art of Persuasion. Penguin Random House, 2020. ISBN 9780593237380.
  • KETCHAM, V. A. The Theory and Practice of Argumentation and Debate. Legare Street, 2020. ISBN 1015924689.
  • MACAGNO, Fabrizio a WALTON, Douglas. Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation: The Pragmatics of Quotation and Reporting. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017.
  • ROTTENBERG, Annette T. a WINCHELL, Donna Haisty. The Structure of Argument. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 2008. ISBN 978-0-312-48048-6.
  • Walton, Douglas. Infromal Logic. A Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge: UP, 2008.
  • Weston, Anthony. A rulebook for arguments. 3rd ed. Indianapolis : Hackett Pub. Co., 2000. ISBN 0-87220-553-3.


Study plans that include the course
Faculty Study plan (Version) Category of Branch/Specialization Recommended year of study Recommended semester